65tpt

Tony G, Can it be?

65tpt.org — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:06:59 +0000

As many had predicted and some expected, the Chiefs traded future Hall of Fame TE Tony Gonzalez to the Falcons today for a second-round pick in the 2010 draft. Gonzalez had requested a trade on multiple occasions, citing his desire to play for a championship-caliber team. As if our Chefs don’t qualify.

The initial shock — even despite significant warning — precludes us from evaluating the transaction objectively, though we won’t know its true value ’til the team finds out exactly which pick they will recieve at the end of the 2010 season.
But, let’s be honest: None of that really matters right now. Most of us remember watching TG bang around clumsily in the paint for the Cal Golden Bears his junior year, averaging a respectable seven points and six rebounds in 28 games and making it to the Sweet Sixteen. We watched as he grew into the NFL’s best and most consistent tight end, a glue-handed reciever without even a milligram of hesitation about leaving his feet in the middle of the field.
And this afternoon, the buzz in innumerable offices around KC reflects the espresso-bittersweetness of his departure.
“Did you hear we traded Tony G,” one of my co-workers asked another.
“Yeah. I’m sick to my stomach,” the other replied.
And that’s probably what most of us are feeling right now — a sense of uncertainty and the queasiness that accompanies every new relationship.
Kansas City’s now involved with a shy, silent mistress called the Patriot Way, and its honeymoon with its tight-lipped new boyfriends is officially over. Chiefs fans can talk all they want about “team first” and building for championships, but it’s in times like these that we have to put our collective money where our ever-flapping gums have been.
When Mr. Hunt gave these guys the keys, quite a few of us handed out gushing endorsements like they were cheese cubes at Sam’s Club. So, in the end, we have no choice but to suck it up. This is the test for Chiefs fans.

We here at TPT think Clark Hunt knew what he was getting the franchise into when he hired Pioli, so don’t expect any Cubanesque hyper-management or press-conference second-guessing on his end. Either way, that doesn’t seem to be how he runs his business.

Tony Gonzalez

Unfortunately, there will be a great number of well-meaning Chiefs fans who give themselves seizures over this trade. TG was off-limits to them, a symbol of greatness amid a decade of mediocrity. And that he was.

To us, though, the key to this trade is that 88’s value could only decline. As nice as it may have been to see him retire in red and gold, we can’t expect the front office to make decisions based on what might be nice or comforting to the fans. [What would Carl do?]How much would that scene, as fitting and romantic as it may have been, be worth to a floundering franchise?

Would TG have helped this (mostly) young team through a huge transition? Absolutely. Would he likely have been Matt Cassel’s best option on third down? Without a doubt. But Pioli and Haley aren’t just looking for guys who can help. They’re looking for guys who want to help. To them, the difference is big enough to warrant such a huge transaction.

The question for Chiefs fans is, do we really trust these guys as much as we keep saying we do?

Little Mikey Phelps and his “Marijuana Pipe”

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:47:32 +0000

I realized, as the week went by, and the Worldwide Leader (among others) bombarded us with yet more coverage on the story, that we forgot to address one of the New Year’s most intriguing events in the catch-up post – our boy Michael Phelps’ little mary jane mishap.

(If you missed out on this contentious little bit of news, just Google “Phelps and Bong”. Kinda fun.)

There seem to be two prevailing sets of opinions on the story and subsequent media hissy-fit, and since we’re all about fairness and balance here at 65TPT, let’s give them both some thought.

Opinion set #1: Phelps deserves every bit of criticism and censure he gets from both his sponsorship and the ruling body of his sport – not to mention the disappointment of fans everywhere. The fact that the photo was news in the first place is the natural and necessary side-effect of worldwide fame and millions in sponsorship dollars.

Once a person of Phelps’ stature decides to trade on his personal image by accepting unGodly amounts of compensation in advertising contracts, it is the public’s right (some would call it duty) to scrutinize said image using the facts at hand. The photo was published responsibly and legally because Phelps is a public figure and has no reasonable expectation of privacy at a college party in South Carolina*.

*I don’t think either side of the argument would dispute this point. Any editor in his or her right mind would publish the photo without much hesitation. Personally, we don’t blame agents of the media for acting on this definition of “news” – we blame YOU, the consumer, for caring. (We would also appreciate it if YOU, the consumer, ignored the fact that WE, the publisher, are only fueling this fire by contradicting ourselves and continuing the discussion. But hey, YOU started it.)

The idea that Phelps - an iconic role model for young people throughout the world - would use an illegal substance is shocking, and his personal decisions regarding recreational drug use represent an important issue for public discourse.

Opinion set #2: Regardless of his status as a record-setting athlete and marketing mammoth, Phelps deserves the same amount of privacy and respect as the rest of us Triple-A’s (Anonymous Average Americans). Why should he be penalized for his monumental success in both competition and business? Ignore the fact that he’s the face of the American Olympic team, and the photo would just be one more of the millions depicting toasted-ass, bong-ripping college students on Facebook and MySpace. Therefore, it deserves just as much press as those photos.

[This set of opinions is almost always attached to a rant about someone’s personal stance on American drug policy (marijuana especially) – a subject we’re neither qualified nor interested enough to broach here. The way we look at it, the law’s the law, and there’s little to accomplish debating it in this forum. Got a problem? Write your senator.]

Our biggest issue with the voluminous coverage and subsequent public-opinion overload related to these types of stories is not the reactions themselves, but that the size and scope of the reactions seem to be directly proportional to the achievements and stature of the offender in question. To us, it suggests that the transgression is far less relevant than the individual who committed it – contradicting the reasoning behind its importance in the first place.

It’s like this: If any other swimmer (besides maybe Dana Torres or Mark Spitz) got caught in a similar fashion, we wouldn’t give a damn. We wouldn’t even know the person by sight, name, or biography, and if someone showed us the photo or took the time to Email it to us, we would very likely disregard it immediately. We’re not interested in healthy discourse about the effects of marijuana on society, or even sports – we simply use those premises as thin veils to disguise our hero-worship and obsession with celebrity.

There’s nothing we love more in this country than a good ol’ fashioned fall from grace. We actually enjoy watching the slow, torturous deaths of the Golden Boys (and Girls), because deep down, we know they never existed in the first place. We’re transfixed by the gory beauty of the melting façade.

Jordan, Jones, A-Rod, Rose, Lawrence Taylor and even Derrick Thomas – the list of battered reputations and shattered public personas grows on us each and every day. And why do we love these stories of loss, transgression, and mistake? Because they make our heroes say, “Sorry.” Make them apologize to us.

It’s better than a rookie-card autograph with a personal note. We love these little circuses, ‘cause they flip the script on the traditional player-fan relationship — empowering us, the ever-forgiving fans, to do our inevitable duty in the infinite cycle of news-media scandal.

And don’t we do it well? Draw up that mental list of disgraced superstars and ask yourself: How many of them have we forgiven? The answer, of course, is every single one who asked for it. Gamblers and cheaters, ‘Roiders and dope-smokers — drive-home drinkers, wife-beaters, liars, and just plain weasely characters – we’ve forgiven them all at some point or another. But why?

Simple: Innocence is power. We, the innocent consumers, fans, admirers and bystanders basically just love judging people – especially those who have it so much better than we do. We feel empowered by the fact that they ask our forgiveness. And all one must do is ask. Perhaps it’s our overwhelmingly Christian heritage, but Americans tend to grant that forgiveness unquestioningly and, usually, without much hesitation.

All we really want to hear is our hero say the words. We’re a lot like the four-year-old’s mother, prodding: “What do you say, Mikey?”

Of course, Little Mikey (as most of us would still like to think of him) has alweady said his sowwees, and USA Swimming sentenced him to a three-month time out. Only one of his sponsors, Kellogg’s, has vowed not to renew his contract — no doubt hoping to protect a generation of Froot Loop-slurping brats from that dreaded gateway into the world of illicit drugs, anonymous sex, senseless crime and militant Islam. (And whatever else we’re scared of at the moment.)

You may get an idea about which set of opinions your humble publishers hold, but that certainly doesn’t discount the other side. Personally, we just don’t like the current trends concerning individual privacy and the media in general – including the media outlets we ourselves choose, like Facebook, MySpace, and myriad others. What does our increasing willingness to publish personal information (and other media i.e. photos, audio and video) mean for the civil rights of the future? Will the law ever step in to stem these ever-deepening tides?

Or, will our generation have to take its lumps – Mikey sure took his last month – and learn our lessons the hard way?

Lakers/Celts: Over before it started?

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:42:48 +0000

So, I’m sitting here in the middle of the second quarter of Game 5 of the NBA Finals, and the Lakers have let yet another double-digit lead ooze out their grasp. The question that comes to mind, of course, is: Why?
The answer, I think, is equally simple: Defense.
The Celtics just finished a 15-0 run, much of which came on easy drives for layups and wide open jump shots. Phil Jackson has to know that the interior of his defense is weak — at times, Pau Gasol looks softer than a recently-tranquilized giraffe. Lamar Odom is a decent defender, but Kevin Garnett makes him look silly when they’re one-on-one, and Odom’s real assets lie with the ball in his hands.
The defense of the men in Green has been lauded appropriately since the season began, and Boston is the best defensive team I’ve seen since the Spurs were young.
Paul Pierce and KG are the best guard-forward defensive tandem since [blasphemy alert] Jordan and Pippen, and even though Pip was a 3 and Garnett a 4, the comparison is apt. These two-thirds of the Big Three have stretches where their men simply do not score, much like MJ and Scottie displayed during their six trips to the Finals.
Pierce may be the most underrated player in the League — and you have no idea how hard that is for this MU grad to print. I guess the blasphemy is coming easy this evening.
Halftime is here, and the Laker lead is down to three. There’s really no telling which way this one will go. If the Celtics can deny Kobe the ball and double-team him as perfectly as they did in the late stages of Game 4, there’s no doubt in my mind that the city of Boston will take home yet another Major Championship this year. But, honestly, there’s no accounting for what Kobe can do in the right situation, and in an elimination scenario, attempting to predict a loss for his team would be like picking Big Brown to finish last at Belmont or Tiger Woods to need an 18-hole playoff to win the U.S. Open.
Tiger’s Father’s Day performance, of course, brings Dad to mind, and I can’t help but think about how lucky I’ve been to grow up in a house with two supportive parents. The worst handicap a young man can have in this country is to grow up without a male role-model, and I was blessed enough to have about five. Where else would I have picked up this undeniable masculinity and sheer machismo?
Thanks, Dad.

Ali: The Greatest, in Ways Innumerable

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:41:42 +0000

This past weekend, 65TPT made an eastbound trip to Louisville, Ky., to celebrate the HS Graduation of its author’s second-youngest cousin on Dad’s side — not that the educational outcome was ever in doubt, mind you. This kid’s so resourceful, he took apart two broken NES systems and wired the working parts together, purely by trial and error, giving birth to a jerry-rigged FrankenTendo, which we used to burn many of the post-midnight hours of the National Memorial Holiday. I guess its tough to relay the importance and sheer heft the celebration had on your humble scribe, but I can’t believe the kid is even driving, much less leaving High School in his dust, and looking up at an English Ed. degree at UK.

My, my, don’t they grow up fast? I must be getting old.

Anyway, we accomplished more last weekend than downing free food and beer, dominating Contra and River City Ransom, and spilling college-days beans to inquisitive relatives.

We had the good fortune to spend Saturday afternoon at the Ali Center in downtown Luhvul, a five-story shrine to the city’s most spectacular athletic product and likely the most influential sports figure these Fifty States have ever seen.

The museum itself, with its intimacy of detail and grandeur of scale, pays fitting tribute to a man who was so much more than fists and feet — a man whose tenacity, fearlessness, and quick tongue helped amass an aura of invincibility around his undeniably human weaknesses: womanizing, racism, and unabashed pride. Unshakable pride.

Now, there’s no doubt that his missteps were highly publicized, and that they were made in the thick midst [and mist] of young stardom. Obviously, Ali suffered more racism than he promoted, but I’m of the opinion that ignorance can’t be cured or tempered with more of its kind. Call me a romantic, or a slow-witted and thick-tongued idealist, but those are my sentiments.

In a society that would have just as quickly lynched a flamboyant black man as accepted him, Ali ran his mouth as if he were paid by the word. [History would prove, of course, that prize-fighters are paid by the word -- by every ear that hears them, in fact. Pay-Per-View is a beautiful racket, no? ]

Ever since Mike Tyson’s Punch Out first ran on my beloved 8-Bit world-changer, I’ve appreciated boxing for its beauty and sheer duality. [Unfortunately, the boxing classic was the only game I tried that wouldn't run on Zach's FrankenTendo. The ironies never cease.] The sport’s base, carnal nature has always been balanced by the grace and precision necessary to practice the sweet science at its highest level. Heavyweight boxing, despite its recent devolution into ahugfest/slugfest dichotomy, represents the pinnacle of athletic achievement to me, because the “game” itself lends no distinct advantage to one party or the other. It’s purely adversarial — aside from weight restrictions, it’s man vs. man.

Forgive my chauvinism of terms, but I’m learning. On the museum’s third level, I saw a video of Laila Ali [to scale, no less] that made me gulp hard — twice. Let’s just say I came away with a greater appreciation of the female athlete. Not that the WNBA and it’s “Expect Great” ads will totally escape this publication’s ire, but that’s another post entirely. [Apparently, we in the sports media have pummeled the word "great" into absolute meaninglessness. But that's all I'll say on the subject for now.]

What astounded me most at the Ali Center was the sheer personal depth of the Greatest — his perspective, and ability to spit his ideals in terms as efficient and biting as lead-eating acid. Plainly put, the man was a poet.

Regardless of the ideals and intentions of the white majority that surrounded and supported him, Ali used the mainstream media to his own ends, and his back-and-forth with Howard Cosell will hopefully live on for decades as television at its best.

Even in his latter years, as Parkinson’s robbed him of his razor-sharp tongue, Ali supplied a final immortal sports moment to the posterity of the 20th Century. The nobility and resolve he showed when he willed his visibly trembling hand to light the Olympic torch in Atlanta seem to make his Parkinson’s contagious. To this day, the footage of that night renders me speechless and gives me the shakes.

In the end, though, the museum stood for more than Ali’s sporting greatness. It was a testament to the man’s principles and adherence thereto.

The quote that summed it up, for me, was this.

“I wish people would love everybody else the way they love me. It would be a better world.”

Summertime Riffs at 3:05 AM: Homemade Ice Cream, The Flying Tongue, Tim Donaghy, and More Bitching about Congress

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:40:45 +0000

You can believe it or not, ladies and gentlemen, but Summer is here.

That means a lot of things: half-days wasted [and spent wasted] on the deck, nights indulging in ridiculous nocturnal tendencies. It means constant consumption of various grilled red meats, homemade ice cream, and lots of beer. Not that the latter is much of a developing trend around here, I suppose. The stunner shades get a hell of a lot more mileage these days, as does the old Honda — sunroof open, of course, and windows all the way down.

Who doesn’t love Summer? Find us that asshole, so we can knock some sense into him.

One of my favorite parts of Summer is, and always has been, the NBA Playoffs. 40 Games in 40 Nights, or so the slogan goes. And that’s just on good old TNT. These days, ESPN even gets a cut since the first round was inexplicably extended to seven games. But, I digress.

See, I was raised in Jordan’s heyday, and the Bulls were the closest team to KC in geographical terms. I’ve also been told that I spent the first year and a half or so of my existence living in the Windy City, though I have no recollections to confirm my parents’ claims. Let’s just say I’m skeptical.

Anyway, I had a tailor made excuse to root for the greatest basketball team to put shoe-marks on hardwood. And lordy, did I. At my house, we spent summer nights laid out on the basement carpet, screaming at the refs from hundreds of miles away [unfortunately, it's a family malady -- I once got thrown out of a high school ball game for mouthing off from the stands, but that's another post entirely] and patiently awaiting His Airness’ next feat of legend. We shot baskets at halftime and everything. It was fairytale stuff, and I miss those days dearly.

Yet again, I digress. The NBA floundered in the years following Jordan’s second retirement, and during his blasphemous time with the Wizards, which Bulls fans have selectively deleted from their memories.

But as I sit here, and the Summer night rolls by outside, I’m watching ESPN’s replay of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals [Thank you, Worldwide Leader -- at least someone understands my sleep schedule]. Boston v. Detroit is looking like a potentially great series, and it’s nice to see the League back on the upswing. Aside from the absence of The Flying Tongue, the NBA suffered from publicized character deficits among its players, and the media’s overplay of the whole “thuggishness” notion, but most of all, the popularity of the League dipped at the hands of the San Antonio Snores, who won four championships featuring the World’s Most Boring Brand of Basketball.

The Spurs/Cavs Finals last year featured more pick and rolls than a bitty-ball tournament, and fewer fast breaks than a game of wheelchair basketball.

I’m not too worried about this year, though, ’cause Kobe and his ridiculously stacked Lakers squad are going to handle the aging Spurs in six, and Lakers/Celts is a dream final for the League.

All is not dreamy in the land of roundball, however, and recent developments in this whole Tim Donaghy mess may spoil the NBA’s Summer in the Sun. Donaghy, a former NBA ref now facing felony gambling charges and up to 25 years in prison, recently admitted to betting on over 100 games he called from 2003 to 2007 — 14 in that final season before he was caught. Surely I need not explain to you, faithful readers of 65TPT, how much influence a basketball official can have on the outcome of a game if he so chooses [that blind bastard who called the district finals my senior year proved the case singlehandedly], and 100 games over four seasons is one hell of a resume.

My question is, where’s Congress and its high and mighty ass now? Where the hell is Arlen Specter? Mr. Waxman, to the floor? If our most trusted legislative body is truly interested in investigating cheating in American pro sports, this is the conspiracy to be nosing around in. This isn’t the marginal advantages of stealing signals (SpyGate) or using steroids (MLB). And this isn’t a situaton where our elected officials are baiting athletes into purjuring themselves, seemingly just for the fun of it. We’re talking about one man deciding games here, in order to profit from betting on the outcome. We’re talking about actual felonies, too, not some cockamamie perjury charge about whether or not Roger Clemens attended a party in 1976.

Truth is, commish David Stern and the NBA have done such an unbelievable job of downplaying the Donaghy situation that there’s no headlines in it for our leeches in office to slurp up. Some of you have probably never heard of this story, but it had far more impact on pro sports in our country than SpyGate and steroids combined. Personally, I’m shocked no suspicious coaches have come out to demand reviews of playoff games they thought might have been decided by Donaghy — perhaps its just an indication of how tightly Stern runs his ship.

Call me crazy for expecting consistency from Congress, but its sudden interest in the sports world sort of demands an investigation, doesn’t it? At least a press conference. Maybe just a shameless pork-barrel amendment to a completely unrelated piece of legislation. They seem to be pretty damned good at that.

OJ Mayo and the hipocracy of the NCAA

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:39:42 +0000

Recently, a former friend of USC roundball star OJ Mayo [and former cocaine dealer] levelled accusations of improper gifts and payments at the player and an employee of a sports agency which Mayo recently chose to represent him before the upcoming NBA draft. Mayo has waived his amateur eligibility by hiring an agent, and will likely be a lottery pick after fulfilling his mandatory one-year sentence in college hoops.
We’re facing another distinctly un-American racket here, folks, ’cause if Mayo had been allowed, the young man would most likely have come straight to the pros out of High School, and been paid most hansomely for it. Now, I’m no lawyer, but about 12.654 seconds [and just three lucky clicks] on Google found me a quote from our own United States Supreme Court [you know, like, the highest legal authority we got] which seems to leave this whole notion of mandatory college attendence in the legal dust of involuntary servitude [also known as"slavery"]. Straight up Fourteenth Amendment, y’all. Check it:
“The liberty mentioned in that [Fourteenth] Amendment means not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties, to be free to use them in all lawful ways; to live and work where he will; to earn his livelihood by any lawful calling; to pursue any livelihood or avocation, and for that purpose to enter into all contracts which may be proper, necessary and essential to his carrying out to a successful conclusion the purposes above mentioned.” (165 US at 589: Allgeyer v. Louisiana – a UNANIMOUS decision, if you were wondering.)
Shouldn’t a young man of legal standing — 18 years old, and in possession of one of our country’s most lucrative talents — be allowed to offer his services to whichever team owns his draft rights? Now, granted, there are provisions which set professional sports apart from your everyday contract situation, but at its heart, this requirement is first-day-of-law-school, flat-out unConsitutional. And if it ain’t, [my legal research skills are shoddy at best] it damn well should be. if not illegal, it’s blatantly unAmerican.
Unfortunately, this is the point in the argument where sports journalists and the rest of our media friends jump in with another steaming helping of age-old bullshit: “it’s for the best,” we like to say. “These kids [make note of the term, if you would] have no idea what it’s like in the pros. They’d get eaten alive without that experience of a higher level of play.”
Now the problem with this argument [not that there's just one] is that if it were true, no high school player would have ever been drafted in the first place. Obviously, there are as many [or more] failures as successes when it comes to 18-year old draftees, but that question is irrelevant. Regardless of whether or not a single given player is equipped to make the decision, we have no choice but to assume he’s capable. Simply put: it’s the law, and his right to do so if he chooses.
Let’s put aside the legal issues associated with curtailing a player’s rights to go pro after high school. For a moment, we’ll live in the fantasy world constructed by the NCAA which preserves the ridiuclous notion of amateurism. The motivations behind this requirement are as shady as its legal underpinnings, and deserve a bit of exploration.
Now, the NCAA is always quick to spout the same nonsense as most sports journalists out there on this topic: that the provision is designed to protect young men from the awful realities and potential ill-effects of professional sports. ['Cause, you know, millions of dollars and thousands of adoring -- however doltish -- fans are terrible burdens for an 18 year old].
Truth is, the provision is designed to protect the NCAA and its market, plain and simple. The amount of money made on the backs of “amateur” collegiate athletes is staggering these days, and like any multi-billion dollar market, those sums must be protected from any and all potential threats. The threat of losing your top-tier, butts-in-seats superstars is one that College Basketball can’t afford to risk. In fact, you might as well call this the LeBron James rule. If LeBron had been a year younger, and forced to attend Ohio State or Duke for a year, think about the millions of dollars those schools would have made off of national television contracts with Disney (which owns ABC and ESPN) and CBS — just a couple of the monster corporations who employ our narrow-minded sports-reporter friends. Now, let’s imagine that, like Greg Oden, LeBron got injured in the year between college-ball sentence and pro-opener. Tore his ACL, let’s say, and lost out on a year’s worth of game-checks– which for him, would be more dull-green ducketts than my high school class will see in our collective lifetimes.
He’d have a clear suit against both the NCAA and the NBA, in my opinion, for squashing his 14th Amendment rights and placing undue regulations on his personal rights of contract. Like I said, I’m no lawyer, but it seems pretty damned obvious.
What I’m getting to, I suppose, is that I really don’t care whether or not Mayo took money from an agent. Hell, somebody should have been compensating him for the hours he spent filling the arenas he played in and pumping up the TV ratings of a second-rate Pac-10 team. Lord knows USC wasn’t.
And I don’t wanna hear any horseshit about the value of a college education. How much can one year of a four-year degree be worth? [And I'm not talking retail, here, either. Damn. Talk about a racket] I’ve sat through freshman year at a massive state school, and I didn’t find the forced memorization of roughly 6,000 powerpoint slides and twenty-five mandatory, 150-question Scantron tests to be of much tangible value.
From what I can tell, Mayo is an intelligent young man — the quotes I’ve read of his make him sound like a grounded, humble guy. He says he rode his bike to class all year, which is a claim my lazy ass could never make.
The question is, why do the NBA and NCAA think they can so blatantly collude against the constitutional rights of an American citizen? If anybody can clear this up for me, I’m all ears.

Clemens and the demise of ACTUAL JOURNALISM in the sports media

65tpt.org — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:38:32 +0000

If you haven’t heard, Congress and the ever-vigilant (read: blood sucking) sports media have delved deeply into the personal and professional life of pitching legend Roger Clemens. Questions about steroid use and marital impropriety have been at the forefront of the allegations and investigations, and Clemens has been quick to deny all suggestions of his wrongdoing.
We’re all about journalistic integrity here at 65TPT, and as Missouri journalism students studying and reporting on sports, we feel like we have at least a basic understanding of the role of the sports media and its importance to fans and even casual consumers.
For years innumerable, the media have jumped at the juicy, sexy stories involving criminal activity or marital infidelity — such is the food for newspaper headlines and news-stand sales — and as far as we’re concerned, it’s time to take a step back and really evaluate the direction in which things are headed.
When our do-nothing, finger-pointing, partisan Congress started investigating steroids in baseball [supposedly justified by the sport's anti-trust exemption and its grassroots importance to Americans from coast to coast] many ball players from Rafi Palmeiro to Mark McGwire, and most recently Clemens, were forced to face questions under oath about their activities, which, at the time, weren’t even against the MLB’s own rules.
The discussion about whether or not Congress should be spending its precious, tax-endowed time investigating organized games instead of organized crime and terrorism should be a short one. The idea that United States Senators [there's only 100 of them for goodness' sake] have nothing more important to do than determine whether or not a few professional athletes used performance-enhancers to prolong their careers and continue to rake in big bucks is ludicrous at best.
We’re a country at war. The socio-economic divide in this country is so wide you could drive a whole fleet of Congressional limos through the damn thing. And health insurance is the biggest racket since, well, there’s probably never been one as big or dangerous.
So why the hell are our elected officials diddling away their time investigating baseball players? [Aside from the blatant grandstanding and press-mongering, that is?] It makes me sick to think that these men and women can’t find a better use for the time we buy as American taxpayers.
And the sports-media is no better. When did it become kosher to publish unsubstantiated allegations about the marital infidelity and personal life decisions of athletes? When did these stories even become important? Frankly, I couldn’t care less whether or not Roger Clemens cheated on his wife. He certainly wouldn’t be the first or most prominent man to do so.
Reporters and editors will always defend themselves with the same age-old bullshit: athletes are role models, and should be scrutinized as such. The truth is that sex and scandal sell papers: always have, always will. So we’re likely in for more, not less, of this irrelevant crap as time goes on.
Let’s take a minute to explore this idea of athletes as modern male role models, ’cause like Charles says, ‘dat’s turrible, man. It’s sickening to think that parents actually rely on and expect these people to provide examples for their children — and blame them when kids start to emulate their risky or disrespectful behaviors. Fact is, parents are the ones who should be providing these good examples, and on a daily basis.
This line of reasoning is just a copout by all the second-rate, selfish parents in this country who think the television is a babysitter, and that the content it spews is anything resembling reality.
It’s true: athletes are role models, but not for moral fiber or wholesomeness. They’re role models for success in athletics and competition, self-reliance, work ethic, and more. But not for young children who desperately need to learn right from wrong. In that arena, athletes are no better than the rest of us.
So let’s see if we can’t lay off the questions about old girlfriends and drug use. If we dig hard enough, there’s dirt on just about all of us, so why can’t we acknowledge the fact and get back to discussing the sports themselves, and not the personal failings of the men and women who play them?

So it begins: KC roots, Chiefs talk, Allen talk…

65tpt.org — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:38:49 +0000

Welcome to the inaugural post of 65 Toss Power Trap. Enjoy.
It’s harder than you’d believe to relate to people what it’s like being a sports fan in Kansas City these days. If they’ve never spent any time there, or didn’t have the pleasure of growing up amongst the sounds of jazz and smells and tastes of the World’s Best Barbecue (Gates’, if you‘re wondering), it’s damn near impossible to make them feel our collective pain.
Fleeting stories of 1985 and 1970, the town’s last championship years of any merit, are all we have to tie us to the historic successes of our now-mediocre pro franchises.
That’s part of the reason we established this little ditty, you know, to vent some of those frustrations and, hopefully, stimulate some discussion about the state of sports and fandom in the Second City of Fountains. It’s a split city, of course, with its majority lying on the Missouri side, and a thin slice suffering the unfortunate fate of geography which locates it in the third-world territory known as “Kansas”. The split is reflected in the city’s politics, its music, and its social life as well — a reality which has more influence on the lives of its citizens than an outsider would ever believe.
The title of the blog, like its authors, is reminiscent of a fairer time. Sixty-five toss power trap, as any true Chiefs fan or avid NFL Films consumer would tell you, was the play that won our beloved Chiefs their first and only Super Bowl, one that KC legend and head-coaching statesman Hank Stram called joyously from the sideline again and again, pounding a then-weak Minnesota Vikings defense en route to a 7-3 victory. 65TPT was also the play that scored the game’s only TD.
So, yeah, we’re nostalgic. What choice do we have? The Chiefs haven’t won a playoff game in 15 years, and last week, the team topped off its worst season in the past 30 by drafting LSU defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey with the No. 5 overall pick.

By public consensus, the Chiefs got a steal in Dorsey. But, as usual, minor success was tempered by monumental failure, as the Chiefs’ front-office succeeded in pissing off and trading the team’s best player and fan favorite, former DE and NFL sack leader Jared Allen, a week before the draft commenced.
For those of you unfamiliar with his background, Allen was a PERFECT star for KC — the one player fans would have identified, if asked, as untouchable. Drafted in the fourth round as a potential long-snapper, this beer-guzzling, handlebar-mustached honkeyascended [don‘t panic: we’re honkeys, too, and are qualified to use the term] — apparently by sheer balls and endless thirst for the quarterback’s blood alone — to the starting slot at right DE for the Chiefs. He wore #69 for Stram’s sake, and we loved him. Two DUI’s and a two-game suspension later [neither of which threatened his demigod status in the 816], GM Carl Peterson called Allen a “young man at risk” — a presumptuous assertion from the greasiest front-office man in sports. And so, the fallout began.
Long story short, Allen claimed he’d never sign a long-term deal with the Chiefs, and implied that his supernatural self-motivation, likely supplied by all the beer and that mustasche, would disappear like a thin fart in high wind. The Chiefs traded Allen in that week before the draft — to the Vikings, ironically [or fittingly, for our fellow cynics] — in exchange for first- and third-round picks in the ‘08Pickstravaganza.
Don’t get us wrong, we’re not upset with the outcome of the trade. The Chiefs got fair value for Allen’s production on the field, but, as usual, the team failed to account for his popularity amongst its unbelievably faithful fan-base. Allen likely sold thousands of tickets [and innumerable twelve-dollar stadium beers] at every Chiefs home game, and that’s a void Glenn Dorsey will likely never be able to fill.
Stay in your seats, Chiefs fans — we LOVE Dorsey, don’t get us wrong. When Al Davis’ senile ass drafted McFadden at four, we just about soiled our Arrowhead-covered undies. He’s a once-an-era player and, hopefully, he’ll anchor a D-line that will sorely miss Mr. Allen. How-ev-ah, Dorsey will never touch our inner honkey like Allen did. And if that’s racist, Jason, you can call us Bull Connor. At least we can admit it…